This week, our first place winner on the insightful side is an anonymous comment responding to Trump’s description of his new microblog platform as “a beacon of freedom” and “a place to speak freely and safely”:
Translation: “You are free to praise and agree with Trump or you are free to shut up and go away.”
In second place, it’s That Anonymous Coward with some thoughts on Hollywood lobbyists fighting against IP waivers for COVID vaccines:
Does anyone still have any doubt that they value copyright more than human life?
Not a SINGLE movie can prevent or treat covid, but JUST IN CASE we should make sure people die for not being able to pony up for access to the IP.
Tell me again how the system isn’t broken and I will so bitch slap you into next week.
For editor’s choice on the insightful side, we start out with an anonymous response to the ol’ “intellectual property promotes innovation” claim:
Wow dude. Way to be completely wrong. Modern American innovation is stunted by modern American “intellectual property” laws. Innovation is discouraged by “IP” laws that penalize/ban innovation that anyone can argue is somehow related to their own works.
It is kind of like someone took a look at the history of western science and said “These people are learning from each other, and frequently come up with ideas based on the ideas that came before. Let us have less of this.”
Next, it’s another anonymous comment in response to the latest example of cops behaving badly:
Cops are… really not great at putting up arguments for why they shouldn’t be defunded.
Over on the funny side, our first place winner is n00bdragon with another response to Hollywood opposing IP waivers:
Those researchers would never have created a COVID vaccine if they didn’t expect a movie to be made about it.
In second place, it’s Stephen T. Stone with a comment about the description of people who “had already decided their conclusion and was looking for strawmen to throw up and tear down in order to ‘bolster’ their point”:
Kinda reminds me of someone around here. Oh, I wish I could think of their name. But damn it all, I can’t come up with that name right now. You got any ideas?
For editor’s choice on the funny side, we start out with a comment from bobvious responding to the argument from Senator Tillis that we can’t go sharing “government-supported research”:
Come now Mike. Don’t you realise that means that Senator Tillis is paying for this out of his OWN pocket??
Finally, we’ve got K’Tetch who did the legwork to make an ironic joke about our post on bogus DMCA scams based on plagiarized websites:
Oh for shame!
How dare you!
Don’t you know I wrote this article first! back on April 31st 1957? How dare you try and claim it as yours!
That’s all for this week, folks!
Go to Source
Author: Leigh Beadon